This is the actual sentence by the way.
"T1,2 and 5 please take back your reports. Got some problems."
You must be thinking what problems right? Well, apparently the problems carried such weight that all of us are willing to drop a kick or two right into his face.
Here are a list of problems detected by him :
- Main hard cover template (where we wrote our names) has the wrong subject code.
- Cover pages titles are not centred.
- Times New Roman fonts are unacceptable.
- Mock screens are too small and the labels are too big.
- Flow chart - the lines are not really connected.
Notes:
(1) The code that he gave was initially wrong. But managed to correct it except for the shadowy effect. Ask him bout that and he reply "tak apa, tak apa." And here he was circling it with a apa apa pen.
(2) It must be directly in the middle where you can strike a bull's eye with a dart. Even a little up like 0.5mm is not acceptable.
(3) This i can explain. We didnt use times new roman! We used Imprint MT shadow! And he accused us of using TNR. Isnt he an expert in fonts? I can even prove to him using soft copy!
(4) Okay. Maybe it was a little too small. But then again, you can just provide some guidelines or something. However you didnt. So we might as well do our own thing. And here you are complaining it was too small or too big when you didnt say anything in the first place!
(5) Frankie's flow chart was circled with a red pen for a stupidly tiny weeny mistake. The lines are only 0.1 or 0.2 mm from connecting the boxes. Must you be so calculative? It's not like if you're showing it to a minister or something.
So to summarize everything, if you have any of those suspicious red marks in your report, you have to reprint and rebind again. And that's another several dollars for it.
And didnt he say before once he rejects our project and that's it? There's no correction you can do? Then why is he asking us to take back and correct it?
It's simple. He's contradicting himself. Nope, i think i should use he is hypo-contradicting himself. There. It sounds better isnt it?
Just a random note, i think "I" and "M" will make a good pair. You see, both have some similarities which i think are very rare. Both are muka tembok and lived in a some kind of "tak tahu malu" fantasy.
"I" is more into the annoying side by repeating asking for your work no matter how busy or how late it is. On the other hand, "m" is more on the authoritive side by taking your work in his hands and modify till it was degraded.
And people, i'm proud to say, i found another two people who are qualified for the title of "hypo-contradicting." Yeap. You have probably guessed it. Congratulations to "I" and "M" for earning the titles with lotsa lotsa hard work effort in which us, the viewers can even detect in our skin.
The reason for this is because, we recently found out that our seniors got relatively low marks with the highest is at 25/30. The second highest is only at 23/30. And both are modify 100% by "M". And yet he give such low marks. (=_=)
As for "I", the just reference technique is proven to be undefeatable. Just by using that phrase, an agreement can be achieved in a most forceful way. However, this cannot be beaten by the ultimate usage of copy, modify, combine and paste. And this "i" claims that it was under the just reference technique. Impressive right people?
That is why, here am i, blogging away this award than giving to them personally.
And so ladies and gentlemen, i present to you the golden pair of the semester :
"I" and "M"
Thanks for all the trouble and incovenience that you caused. Just to let you know. I dont appreciate it one bit.
Byebye~
***
P/S : This particular post is not directed at anyone. If you are offended, i wont apologize. I have the freedom of speech after all. Thank you very much.
3 Boos:
hahahahahahah..."I" and "M" is the most perfect pair!!! XD
yawei
that's why the pair of the semester mah
=P
Haihz...... Don't know what to say...
Post a Comment